India Trade — Sector & Policy Recommendations

Policy & investment insight dashboard

A direct, primary-source verification pass across 9 administering ministries/departments — not PIB, not press — covering every PLI/incentive scheme this repo tracks: how much of each scheme's outlay is actually utilized, what incentives remain, and whether the application window is still open. Also tests two specific data sources for state/sector development tracking — DPIIT's IEM Form A/B intent-to-implementation data and MoSPI's mega-project monitoring — and reports honestly where neither fits as cleanly as hoped.

SOURCES: MeitY, Ministry of Steel, Department of Heavy Industry, Department of Pharmaceuticals, DPIIT, Ministry of Textiles, Department of Chemicals & Petrochemicals, Ministry of Civil Aviation/Defence Production — each ministry's own site, annual reports, and Parliamentary Standing Committee submissions prioritized over PIB/press. Plus DPIIT's IEM data and MoSPI's PAIMANA portal. Retrieved 2026-07-19.

Citation corrections surfaced by this research pass

Fixes to apply across this repo

Scheme utilization, incentives & application status

14 schemes across 5 ministries/departments
Open accepting applications now
Partially open one sub-component only
Closing / recently closed tenure ending or just wound up
Extension pending ministry itself requesting more time
Closed selection complete, no new applicants

PM MITRA textile parks — a separate infrastructure scheme

7 sites approved

IEM Form A / Form B: can it show conversion for projects above ₹150cr?

Honest answer: no, not as DPIIT publishes it
The honest finding

DPIIT's published IEM data has no investment-size band anywhere — not in the monthly IEM Statistics Report, not in the Annual Report appendices, not on the NSWS filing portal. The ₹150 crore threshold doesn't belong to DPIIT/IEM at all — it's MoSPI's separate cutoff for Central Sector infrastructure monitoring, a different dataset entirely with no shared key. A clean "Form A/B for projects above ₹150cr" filter is not possible from public data as it stands. Update (verified interactively 2026-07-19): searching "IEM" in DPIIT's restructured publications listing returns "No Data Available", and the legacy SIA-statistics route is a dead page — the monthly IEM Statistics Report series is now verifiably absent from the listing, not merely unconfirmed.

Best available proxy: same-year aggregate flow ratio (Part-B ÷ Part-A that year) — NOT a cohort-matched conversion rate. Updated to Annual Report 2025-26, Appendices III–VI (verified against the source PDF's Grand Total rows)

5-year aggregate (2021 – Dec 2025): 68.8% — and the trend broke sharply upward: 82.0% in 2024, then 109.9% in 2025 — Part-B implemented investment exceeded same-year Part-A intentions for the first time in the series. Since Part-B lags Part-A by years, this reads as the 2021-22 intent surge (₹7.7 lakh cr proposed in 2021 alone) maturing into 2024-25 implementation. Part-A filing counts simultaneously fell steeply (1,267 → 986 → 702), consistent with the Apr 2025 threshold raise (₹50cr → ₹125cr) cutting smaller filings — fewer, larger IEMs. Revision warning: AR 2024-25's 2024-to-Nov Part-B figure (₹2.96 lakh cr) became ₹4.94 lakh cr in AR 2025-26's full-2024 column — treat partial-year IEM figures as heavily provisional. Continuity nuance: the monthly IEM report series is dead, but the annual appendix series survives the NSWS migration.

MoSPI mega-projects: does it show state-level development in these 10 sectors?

Honest answer: no, it's scoped to public infrastructure only
The honest finding

MoSPI's Infrastructure and Project Monitoring Division tracks Central Sector projects ≥₹150cr implemented by ministries, PSUs, and statutory agencies — roads, rail, power, coal, PSU steel-plant upgrades. None of this repo's 10 priority sectors appear as tracked categories (confirmed by a full-text search of the March 2026 Flash Report). MoSPI also quietly stopped classifying projects as "delayed" after May 2025 — a real transparency regression from its earlier reporting.

Sectors MoSPI actually tracks (1,941 ongoing projects, ₹41.5 lakh crore revised cost) — none of this repo's 10 priority sectors present

"Energy Storage" (15 projects) sounds relevant but is confirmed to be pumped-hydro plants run by NHPC/NTPC — not battery gigafactories. "Steel" (18 projects, ₹17,812cr) is entirely SAIL/PSU plant upgrades (Bhilai, Bokaro, IISCO) — no Tata Steel or JSW project appears.

State-wise mega-project table exists — but measures public infrastructure spend, not private manufacturing FDI
StateMega-projects trackedRevised cost (₹cr)

None of this repo's named flagship private projects (Tata Steel Kalinganagar, Micron Sanand, Tata-PSMC Dholera, Reliance's battery gigafactories, RRPCL) appear in this tracking. What does appear: the enabling public infrastructure around some hubs — "Development of Dholera International Greenfield Airport" (AAI, ₹1,305cr) and "Transmission System for Reliable Power Supply to Dholera" (POWERGRID, ₹319cr).

DPIIT publications update: the FDI series just gained a year

dpiit.gov.in/documents/publications, checked 2026-07-19

The Quarterly FDI Factsheet for Q4 FY2025-26 (published 3 Jun 2026) closes the full FY2025-26 year: FDI equity inflow ₹5,16,936cr / $58.85bn — up 23% in INR and 18% in USD over FY2024-25 ($50.02bn). This extends this repo's FDI series by a full year: the FDI-vs-PLI-launch bulletin's sector tables end at FY2024-25, when the national cycle was flat-to-declining — any post-FY25 sector re-analysis must re-baseline against a now-rising national cycle. Sector-wise and state-wise FY2025-26 splits are in the same factsheet (Services and Computer Software & Hardware still top; Maharashtra/Karnataka/Gujarat the top states) but are not yet re-extracted into the sector verdicts — flagged as the first task for the next quarterly refresh, along with the updated FDI metadata document (27 Feb 2026) that may supersede the "Documentation on methodology: Not applicable" version this repo quotes.

FY2025-26 sector extension (Newsletter Vol. XXXIV No.4, Table 12) — raw DPIIT proxy categories, $ million; verdicts not yet re-run
DPIIT proxy categoryFY2024-25FY2025-26ChangeRead
Electronics2,0431,153−43.5%The "strongest signal" sector nearly halved even as national FDI grew 18% — verdict re-examination needed.
Drugs & Pharmaceuticals8911,912+114%More than doubled — the prior two-year decline reversed sharply.
Automobile Industry1,5862,459+55%Strong rebound; needs deal-level tracing before crediting PLI (the FY21-22 lesson).
Electrical Equipments (White Goods proxy)531840+58%First meaningful post-launch rise — consistent with "full subscription Jan 2026, wave still ahead."
Metallurgical Industries (Steel proxy)951839−12%Still below pre-launch baseline; POSCO-JSW's Apr-2026 cash lands in next year's data.
Medical & Surgical Appliances627374−40%The "cleanest positive result" reversed — consistent with its concentration in a few MNC deals.

State side (Table 13): Maharashtra $18.4bn (31.3%), Karnataka $12.9bn, Gujarat $5.7bn, Tamil Nadu $4.7bn — and Assam: $2.37M, still essentially zero against the ₹27,000cr Tata Electronics headline. The registered-office/domestic-capital finding holds for a second consecutive year. All 27 newsletter statement PDFs archived; extracted with layout-preserving parsing to keep name↔value pairing reliable.

AHIDF: the counter-example that proves transparency is a choice

Animal Husbandry Infrastructure Development Fund, DAHD
The verdict

AHIDF's dashboard (a public, no-login Power BI report at ahidf.udyamimitra.in, refreshed nightly — "Data Last Updated on 19-07-26, 12:11 AM" when checked) is a genuine counter-example to everything above: state-wise, district-wise, and bank-wise splits; the full application funnel including rejections and withdrawals; and sanctioned and disbursed amounts side by side. No PLI ministry publishes anything close. Its precise ceiling: still aggregates-only (no project/promoter list), and it stops at "loan disbursed" — one gate short of "project operational."

The funnel AHIDF actually publishes (₹ crore where amounts)

Alongside: 3,974 rejected in screening, 3,939 withdrawn, 304 rejected by lenders — ~96% of applications have not reached disbursement, and the scheme window closes 31.03.2026 with ~₹5,405cr disbursed against a ~₹29,610cr outlay envelope. State leaders (approved projects, Lok Sabha USQ 251): Maharashtra 63 projects/₹1,836cr, West Bengal 31, UP 30, Tamil Nadu 29/₹1,295cr. Caveats: at least four different "sanctioned" counts circulate depending on stage (910 lender sanctions vs 541/486/366 in ministry documents); the employment KPI (94,593) is a projection "from Sanction Stage," not measured jobs; and DAHD's own page states a ₹29,110cr outlay while the Cabinet announcement says ₹29,610cr — an unresolved ₹500cr discrepancy.

Cross-cutting synthesis

What this ministry-verification pass adds to the repo's earlier findings
Errata & methodology notes
  • "Application status" reflects each scheme's most recent published round — several PLI schemes accept periodic reopened windows even after being marked "closed" here; always check the ministry's current notification before assuming a door is permanently shut.
  • No ministry researched ever describes its own scheme as "undersubscribed" in a primary document, even where repeated reopening rounds strongly imply it — every reopening is framed as evidence of growing industry interest. This repo does not adopt that framing uncritically.
  • The IEM and MoSPI sections are included specifically to show where the requested data doesn't fit, not to force a stretched connection — India's investment-tracking infrastructure is fragmented across agencies with no shared project key.
  • Underlying data: data/policy_investment_dashboard_2026-07-19.json.